[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1513178583.3296.2.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:23:04 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"amir73il@...il.com" <amir73il@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"max.byungchul.park@...il.com" <max.byungchul.park@...il.com>,
"byungchul.park@....com" <byungchul.park@....com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: About the try to remove cross-release feature entirely by Ingo
On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 16:13 +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> In addition, I want to say that the current level of
> classification is much less than 100% but, since we
> have annotated well to suppress wrong reports by
> rough classifications, finally it does not come into
> view by original lockdep for now.
The Linux kernel is not a vehicle for experiments. The majority of false
positives should have been fixed before the crossrelease patches were sent
to Linus.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists