[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213085847.3d3245c6@t450s.home>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:58:47 -0700
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, tursulin@...ulin.net,
dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Fix shift overflow in qi_flush_dev_iotlb
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:13:55 +0800
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 03:43:08PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> > index 9a7ffd13c7f0..87888b102057 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> > @@ -1345,7 +1345,9 @@ void qi_flush_dev_iotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid, u16 qdep,
> > struct qi_desc desc;
> >
> > if (mask) {
> > - BUG_ON(addr & ((1 << (VTD_PAGE_SHIFT + mask)) - 1));
> > + BUG_ON((mask > MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH) ||
> > + ((mask == MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH) && addr) ||
> > + (addr & ((1 << (VTD_PAGE_SHIFT + mask)) - 1)));
>
> Could it work if we just use 1ULL instead of 1 here? Thanks,
In either case we're talking about shifting off the end of the
variable, which I understand to be undefined. Right? Thanks,
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists