[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171213160357.3se4vvyo5lqud2uo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 17:03:57 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Utilization estimation (util_est) for FAIR tasks
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:10:14PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> With this feature enabled, the measured overhead is in the range of ~1%
> on the same HW/SW test configuration.
That's quite a lot; did you look where that comes from?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists