[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1513293754.18523.287.camel@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 23:22:34 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
john.stultz@...aro.org
Cc: y2038@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [Y2038] [PATCH v2 04/10] arch: introduce CONFIG_64BIT_TIME
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 11:30 -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> There are a total of 53 system calls (aside from ioctl) that pass a time_t
> or derived data structure as an argument, and in order to extend time_t
> to 64-bit, we have to replace them with new system calls and keep providing
> backwards compatibility.
>
> To avoid adding completely new and untested code for this purpose, we
> introduce a new CONFIG_64BIT_TIME symbol. Every architecture that supports
> new 64 bit time_t syscalls enables this config via ARCH_HAS_64BIT_TIME.
>
> After this is done for all architectures, the CONFIG_64BIT_TIME symbol
> will be deleted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 4f03534bfa6b..11810c29c1fa 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -873,6 +873,17 @@ config OLD_SIGACTION
> config COMPAT_OLD_SIGACTION
> > bool
>
> +config ARCH_HAS_64BIT_TIME
> + def_bool n
> +
> +config 64BIT_TIME
> + def_bool ARCH_HAS_64BIT_TIME
> + help
> + This should be selected by all architectures that need to support
> + new system calls with a 64-bit time_t. This is relevant on all 32-bit
> + architectures, and 64-bit architectures as part of compat syscall
> + handling.
Doesn't this text belong with ARCH_HAS_64BIT_TIME?
Ben.
> +
> config ARCH_NO_COHERENT_DMA_MMAP
> bool
>
--
Ben Hutchings
Software Developer, Codethink Ltd.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists