[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171214075132.GB31378@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:51:32 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com>,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hyperv: make HYPERV a menuconfig to ease disabling it all
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:23:38PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:54:19 +0100
> Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Stephen Hemminger
> > <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
> > > Will this break existing configs?
> >
> > I don't think so. Last time I did some similar changes, the kbuild
> > test robot found some warnings on some configurations, I hope
> > it will find problems (if any) for that series too (this one is not alone,
> > I've got a bunch of other similar patches in-flight)
> >
> > Thanks
>
> NAK
>
> Let me give a concrete example of how this will break users.
>
> 1. Assume user has a working .config file in their kernel build directory
> which builds a kernel that works on Hyper-V.
>
> 2. Add your patch (or assume it makes into a later version).
>
> 3. User then does
>
> $ make oldconfig
> scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig Kconfig
> *
> * Restart config...
> *
> *
> * Microsoft Hyper-V guest support
> *
> Microsoft Hyper-V guest support (HYPERV_MENU) [N/y] (NEW)
>
> If they hit return, the default value is not enabling HyperV and they
> will then go on to build a kernel that will not boot on your system.
>
> The default MUST be set to Yes.
Or you can just not take these types of odd and silly changes to the
Kconfig files, and leave it as-is. I have yet to see the good reason
why these are needed at all.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists