linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/148] 4.9.69-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:53:49 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/148] 4.9.69-stable review

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:28:44PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On 12 December 2017 at 18:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.69 release.
> > There are 148 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu Dec 14 12:43:58 UTC 2017.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.9.69-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.9.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.
> 
> Note:
> Newly added selftests/net/reuseport_bpf FAILED in full run on x86_64 and
> the independent test execution resulted as PASS.
> For the internal investigation bug reported.
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3502#c4

Thanks for testing and letting me know.

greg k-h