linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v19 3/7] xbitmap: add more operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2017 04:37:01 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Cc:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
        virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mst@...hat.com,
        mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mawilcox@...rosoft.com, david@...hat.com, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, aarcange@...hat.com,
        amit.shah@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        liliang.opensource@...il.com, yang.zhang.wz@...il.com,
        quan.xu@...yun.com, nilal@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 3/7] xbitmap: add more operations

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 08:26:06PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 12/12/2017 09:20 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Can you eliminate exception path and fold all xbitmap patches into one, and
> > post only one xbitmap patch without virtio-baloon changes? If exception path
> > is valuable, you can add exception path after minimum version is merged.
> > This series is too difficult for me to close corner cases.
> 
> That exception path is claimed to save memory, and I don't have a strong
> reason to remove that part.
> Matthew, could we get your feedback on this?

Sure.  This code is derived from the IDA code in lib/idr.c.  Eventually,
I intend to reunite them.  For IDA, it clearly makes sense; the first 62
entries result in allocating no memory at all, which is going to be 99%
of users.  After that, we allocate 128 bytes which will serve the first
1024 users.

The xbitmap, as used by Wei's patches here is going to be used somewhat
differently from that.  I understand why Tetsuo wants the exceptional
path removed; I'm not sure the gains will be as important.  But if we're
going to rebuild the IDA on top of the xbitmap, we need to keep them.

I really want to pay more attention to this, but I need to focus on
getting the XArray finished.