[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171214130846.GC10791@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:08:46 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/wait: assert the wait_queue_head lock is
held in __wake_up_common
On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 01:50:33AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Makes sense. Would you like to carry this patch together with the epoll patch, to
> be able to test them both? If yes then:
It would be good to merge them all together. I still thing the sched
tree might be the best place for all of them, but I'll let you fight that
out with Andrew once the next iteration is posted :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists