linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixed voltage regulator: Adjustments for two function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2017 14:21:55 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixed voltage regulator: Adjustments for two function
 implementations

> Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:55:44 +0200
> 
> Two update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (2):
>   Delete error messages for failed memory allocations in reg_fixed_voltage_probe()
>   Improve a size determination in two functions
> 
>  drivers/regulator/fixed.c | 16 +++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

How are the chances that such change possibilities will be integrated
in this software module?

Regards,
Markus