linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] userfaultfd: use fault

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171214152344.6880-3-hch@lst.de>
Date:   Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:23:43 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] userfaultfd: use fault_wqh lock

From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>

The epoll code currently uses the unlocked waitqueue helpers for managing
fault_wqh, but instead of holding the waitqueue lock for this waitqueue
around these calls, it the waitqueue lock of fault_pending_wq, which is
a different waitqueue instance.  Given that the waitqueue is not exposed
to the rest of the kernel this actually works ok at the moment, but
prevents the epoll locking rules from being enforced using lockdep.

Switch to the internally locked waitqueue helpers instead.  This means
that the lock inside fault_wqh now nests inside the fault_pending_wqh
lock, but that's not a problem since it was entireyl unused before.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
[hch: slight changelog updates]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 fs/userfaultfd.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index ac9a4e65ca49..a39bc3237b68 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	 */
 	spin_lock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
 	__wake_up_locked_key(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, &range);
-	__wake_up_locked_key(&ctx->fault_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, &range);
+	__wake_up(&ctx->fault_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, 1, &range);
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
 
 	/* Flush pending events that may still wait on event_wqh */
@@ -1045,7 +1045,7 @@ static ssize_t userfaultfd_ctx_read(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx, int no_wait,
 			 * anyway.
 			 */
 			list_del(&uwq->wq.entry);
-			__add_wait_queue(&ctx->fault_wqh, &uwq->wq);
+			add_wait_queue(&ctx->fault_wqh, &uwq->wq);
 
 			write_seqcount_end(&ctx->refile_seq);
 
@@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static void __wake_userfault(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
 		__wake_up_locked_key(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh, TASK_NORMAL,
 				     range);
 	if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->fault_wqh))
-		__wake_up_locked_key(&ctx->fault_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, range);
+		__wake_up(&ctx->fault_wqh, TASK_NORMAL, 1, range);
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
 }
 
-- 
2.14.2