[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWfm+BXKuRCN44NjpG37NA8+gFNYPK9gVTcUXzckpv9nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:21:40 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirsky <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>,
"Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@...zon.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/17] x86/mm: Force LDT desc accessed bit
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:27 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> In preparation to mapping the LDT RO, unconditionally set the accessed
> bit.
I like this patch, but only as part of a standalone series to harden
the kernel by making the LDT be RO so we can revert the series if
needed. I don't like it as a prerequisite to having a working kernel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists