[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171214175931.mlvr7lk7bcnsqu5i@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 18:59:31 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: Show up to three levels for a deadlock scenario
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38:52PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Currently, when lockdep detects a possible deadlock scenario that involves 3
> or more levels, it just shows the chain, and a CPU sequence order of the
> first and last part of the scenario, leaving out the middle level and this
> can take a bit of effort to understand. By adding a third level, it becomes
> easier to see where the deadlock is.
So is anybody actually using this? This (together with the callchain for
#0) is always the first thing of the lockdep output I throw away.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists