[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJrjb9xDD5b65LXVVroEOGf9R1iAHZXZT0Ym6ApchLeig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:42:21 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Remove leading 0x and 0s from bindings notation
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 19:03 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 12/14/2017 05:53 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> [...]
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> > index 26396ef53bde..0446b122a6e2 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
>> > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@
>> > reg = <0 0x10005000 0 0x1000>;
>> > };
>> >
>> > - pio: pinctrl@...0005000 {
>> > + pio: pinctrl@...05000 {
>> > compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-pinctrl";
>> > reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
>> > mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
>>
>> Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>
> Should all of these be fixed?
>
> $ git grep -P "^\s*\w+:\s*[\w\-]+@0[xX]" -- "*.dts*" | wc -l
> 69
Yes, there's patches for all arches.
>
> Is this a pattern that should be added to checkpatch?
No, because dtc provides the warnings.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists