lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20171214202726.GA32443@kroah.com> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 21:27:26 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 05/27] x86/efi: Build our own page table structures On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 05:24:32PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org] > > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:27 PM > > To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>; Ghannam, Yazen > > <Yazen.Ghannam@....com> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; stable@...r.kernel.org; Matt Fleming > > <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>; Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>; Andrew > > Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>; Andy Lutomirski > > <luto@...capital.net>; Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>; Ard Biesheuvel > > <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>; Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>; Brian Gerst > > <brgerst@...il.com>; Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>; Denys > > Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>; H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>; Linus > > Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>; Peter Zijlstra > > <peterz@...radead.org>; Sai Praneeth Prakhya > > <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>; Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>; > > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>; Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>; > > linux-efi@...r.kernel.org; Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>; Ghannam, > > Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>; Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 05/27] x86/efi: Build our own page table structures > > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:43:49PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 16:59 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > > know. > > > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > > > From: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> > > > > > > > > commit 67a9108ed4313b85a9c53406d80dc1ae3f8c3e36 upstream. > > > [...] > > > > > > It looks like this will cause regressions unless you also apply: > > > > > > 21cdb6b56843 x86/mm: Page align the '_end' symbol to avoid pfn > > conversion bugs > > > b61a76f8850d x86/efi: Map RAM into the identity page table for mixed > > mode > > > 753b11ef8e92 x86/efi: Setup separate EFI page tables in kexec paths > > > > > > and possibly also: > > > > > > 08914f436bdd x86/platform/UV: Bring back the call to map_low_mmrs in > > uv_system_init > > > 683ad8092cd2 x86/efi: Fix 7-parameter efi_call()s > > > 80e75596079f efi: Convert efi_call_virt() to efi_call_virt_pointer() > > > d1be84a232e3 x86/uv: Update uv_bios_call() to use efi_call_virt_pointer() > > > > Ugh, that's a mess. Yazen is the one who reported this patch, and 2 > > others, were needed to resolve an issue on their hardware. > > > > Yazen, any thoughts here? Should I just revert the 3 patches, or do you > > also feel I need all 7 of these to ensure everything works properly? > > > > I think it's okay to revert the 3 patches. Ugh, messy. Ok, all now reverted. Thanks Ben for the review, much appreciated. greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists