[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxj0_F4Fcs-_1zUP0pXEr6DZqENc7pKUf4unE06Zs8iug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:47:56 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix resume on x86-32 machines
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> But given this is already "regression fix for x86-64 caused regression
> on x86-32", I really believe we should merge trivial fix now, and do
> the cleanups / nicer fixes sometime later?
The fix patch was already posted, but in another thread (confusingly
with _almost_ the same subject: "Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in
resume from ACPI S3").
Here:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/fixes
but it hasn't actually gotten to me yet (I think Luto made a new
version where he split it up into three smaller patches, and I'm
assuming it's in one of the -tip trees heading for me asap).
All the x86 people have been insanely busy with the crazy page table
isolation patches, that probably is slowing down things. But I was
expecting to get the -tip tree pulls tomorrow (.. because.. Friday.
It's my busiest day of the week because everybody wants to get their
work out before the weekend).
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists