[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171214222248.GA784@amd>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 23:22:48 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix resume on x86-32 machines
On Thu 2017-12-14 12:47:56, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> >
> > But given this is already "regression fix for x86-64 caused regression
> > on x86-32", I really believe we should merge trivial fix now, and do
> > the cleanups / nicer fixes sometime later?
>
> The fix patch was already posted, but in another thread (confusingly
> with _almost_ the same subject: "Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in
> resume from ACPI S3").
>
> Here:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/fixes
>
> but it hasn't actually gotten to me yet (I think Luto made a new
> version where he split it up into three smaller patches, and I'm
> assuming it's in one of the -tip trees heading for me asap).
Ok.. It did not apply cleanly. ... but I see fresh patches in my
inbox, let me test those.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists