linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] bpf: add a bpf_override

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:34:18 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <ast@...nel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        <mhiramat@...nel.org>
CC:     Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] bpf: add a bpf_override_function helper

On 12/15/17 11:12 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_KPROBE_OVERRIDE
> +BPF_CALL_2(bpf_override_return, struct pt_regs *, regs, unsigned long, rc)
> +{
> +	__this_cpu_write(bpf_kprobe_override, 1);
> +	regs_set_return_value(regs, rc);
> +	arch_ftrace_kprobe_override_function(regs);
> +	return 0;
> +}

since you're doing a respin can you adopt the change I did to make
this helper fail at load time if that #config is not set
instead of runtime?

Also how big is the v9-v10 change ?
May be do it as separate patch, since previous set already sitting
in bpf-next and there are patches on top?