[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12296c9b-d215-20d4-843e-4c9c9c06f0be@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:49:09 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ankit Kumar <ankit@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix parse_args cycle limit check.
On 12/15/2017 01:41 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Actually args are supposed to be renamed to next so both and args hold the
> previous argument so both can be passed to the callback. This additionla patch
additional
> should fix up the rename.
Would you try rewriting the first sentence, please? I don't get it.
> ---
> kernel/params.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists