[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVwuQoSCBGCAeXbDgfiP2zREMK70r2kvA_1sRm3aFgq1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:01:50 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm: rcar-du: calculate DPLLCR to be more small jitter
Hi Morimoto-san,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com> wrote:
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
> In general, PLL has VCO (= Voltage controlled oscillator),
> one of the very important electronic feature called as "jitter"
> is related to this VCO.
> In academic generalism, VCO should be maximum to be more small jitter.
> In high frequency clock, jitter will be large impact.
> Thus, selecting Hi VCO is general theory.
Thanks for your patch!
> One note here is that it should be 2000 < fvco < 4096MHz
2000 Hz? (else it could be misinterpreted that MHz applies to both values).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists