[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO-hwJKWqyD8EYN8k+TE0XfBOAC0Bzcj87BNnxHiGbpVgKnDTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:04:04 +0100
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] input - leds: fix bugs found by fuzzing
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Samuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Benjamin Tissoires, on jeu. 14 déc. 2017 14:25:20 +0100, wrote:
>> I marked them as stable as I believe eventhough not many
>> people discovered those and reported them, they should
>> still be fixed in current kernels.
>
> Well, the quoted source lines are not in any stable tree, I don't even
> find them in the mainline tree. Where do these lines come from?
Oops, indeed, the patch 1/2 fixes a local commit I wrote to fix the
LED not being updated after the connect, that has already been
rejected upstream. (FWIW, it was
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9542397/)
Dmitry, please disregard 1/2 and only have a look at 2/2.
Cheers,
Benjamin
>
> Samuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists