[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ce6909d-c952-78e7-0b54-6159b6d8148c@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:02:15 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc: rkrcmar@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
jmattson@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] KVM/x86: Check input paging mode when cs.l is set
On 14/12/2017 09:01, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> Reported by syzkaller:
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 27962 at arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:5631 x86_emulate_insn+0x557/0x15f0 [kvm]
> Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm [last unloaded: kvm]
> CPU: 0 PID: 27962 Comm: syz-executor Tainted: G B W 4.15.0-rc2-next-20171208+ #32
> Hardware name: Intel Corporation S1200SP/S1200SP, BIOS S1200SP.86B.01.03.0006.040720161253 04/07/2016
> RIP: 0010:x86_emulate_insn+0x557/0x15f0 [kvm]
> RSP: 0018:ffff8807234476d0 EFLAGS: 00010282
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88072d0237a0 RCX: ffffffffa0065c4d
> RDX: 1ffff100e5a046f9 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffff88072d0237c8
> RBP: ffff880723447728 R08: ffff88072d020000 R09: ffffffffa008d240
> R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffffed00e7d87db3 R12: ffff88072d0237c8
> R13: ffff88072d023870 R14: ffff88072d0238c2 R15: ffffffffa008d080
> FS: 00007f8a68666700(0000) GS:ffff880802200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 000000002009506c CR3: 000000071fec4005 CR4: 00000000003626f0
> Call Trace:
> x86_emulate_instruction+0x3bc/0xb70 [kvm]
> ? reexecute_instruction.part.162+0x130/0x130 [kvm]
> vmx_handle_exit+0x46d/0x14f0 [kvm_intel]
> ? trace_event_raw_event_kvm_entry+0xe7/0x150 [kvm]
> ? handle_vmfunc+0x2f0/0x2f0 [kvm_intel]
> ? wait_lapic_expire+0x25/0x270 [kvm]
> vcpu_enter_guest+0x720/0x1ef0 [kvm]
> ...
>
> When CS.L is set, vcpu should run in the 64 bit paging mode.
> Current kvm set_sregs function doesn't have such check when
> userspace inputs sreg values. This will lead unexpected behavior.
> This patch is to add checks for CS.L, EFER.LME, EFER.LMA and
> CR4.PAE when get SREG inputs from userspace in order to avoid
> unexpected behavior.
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
> ---
> Change since v2:
> Change coding style.
> Change since v1:
> Add check for EFER.LME, EFER.LMA and CR4.PAE.
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 1e1e617..9eb1217 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7485,6 +7485,29 @@ int kvm_task_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 tss_selector, int idt_index,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_task_switch);
>
> +int kvm_valid_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
> +{
> + if ((sregs->efer & EFER_LME) && (sregs->cr0 & X86_CR0_PG_BIT)) {
> + /*
> + * When EFER.LME and CR0.PG are set, the processor is in
> + * 64-bit mode (though maybe in a 32-bit code segment).
> + * CR4.PAE and EFER.LMA must be set.
> + */
> + if (!(sregs->cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE_BIT)
> + || !(sregs->efer & EFER_LMA))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Not in 64-bit mode: EFER.LMA is clear and the code
> + * segment cannot be 64-bit.
> + */
> + if (sregs->efer & EFER_LMA || sregs->cs.l)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_sregs *sregs)
> {
> @@ -7497,6 +7520,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> (sregs->cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (kvm_valid_sregs(vcpu, sregs))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> apic_base_msr.data = sregs->apic_base;
> apic_base_msr.host_initiated = true;
> if (kvm_set_apic_base(vcpu, &apic_base_msr))
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists