[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <001475f3-ad4c-4d89-dec2-362f7e28da33@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:18:28 +0200
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH urgent 0/3] __restore_processor_state() fixes
On 12/15/2017 03:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:19:04 PM CET Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> __restore_processor_state() was spaghetti code, made no sense, and
>> had bugs. And I broke resume on 32-bit systems. This series cleans
>> it up and fixes it (hopefully!).
>>
>> Andy Lutomirski (3):
>> x86/power/64: Use struct desc_ptr for the IDT in struct saved_context
>> x86/power/32: Move SYSENTER MSR restoration to fix_processor_context()
>> x86/power: Make restore_processor_context() sane
>
> For all three:
>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
Works still after split up so my tested by remains. Please note Pavel
gave his reported/tested-by in 3/3.
--
Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists