[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gAiSiwwcWpHXWGEpo_Tjy4tqy1D5XvL==BJeuQ6LRKOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 02:01:20 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Jerry Tang <jtang@...e.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] APEI / ERST: Fix missing error handling in erst_reader()
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> The commit f6f828513290 ("pstore: pass allocated memory region back to
> caller") changed the check of the return value from erst_read() in
> erst_reader() in the following way:
>
> if (len == -ENOENT)
> goto skip;
> - else if (len < 0) {
> - rc = -1;
> + else if (len < sizeof(*rcd)) {
> + rc = -EIO;
> goto out;
>
> This introduced another bug: since the comparison with sizeof() is
> cast to unsigned, a negative len value doesn't hit any longer.
> As a result, when an error is returned from erst_read(), the code
> falls through, and it may eventually lead to some weird thing like
> memory corruption.
>
> This patch adds the negative error value check more explicitly for
> addressing the issue.
>
> Fixes: f6f828513290 ("pstore: pass allocated memory region back to caller")
That's ancient. :-)
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Jerry Tang <jtang@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
> index 6742f6c68034..9bff853e85f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static ssize_t erst_reader(struct pstore_record *record)
> /* The record may be cleared by others, try read next record */
> if (len == -ENOENT)
> goto skip;
> - else if (len < sizeof(*rcd)) {
> + else if (len < 0 || len < sizeof(*rcd)) {
> rc = -EIO;
> goto out;
> }
> --
OK, I'm going to queue this up unless I see objections from Boris or Tony.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists