| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1513344093.29404.26.camel@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:21:34 +0000
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To: "prameela.garnepudi@...pinesignals.com"
<prameela.garnepudi@...pinesignals.com>
CC: "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"amitkarwar@...il.com" <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
"amit.karwar@...pinesignals.com" <amit.karwar@...pinesignals.com>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: rsi_91x: Low bandwidth: sends ~100 Kbits/sec, receives ~1.5
Mbits/sec
Hi Prameela,
On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 18:14 +0530, Prameela Rani Garnepudi wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
>
> On Friday 15 December 2017 04:50 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Hi Prameela,
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-12-15 at 11:13 +0530, Prameela Rani Garnepudi wrote:
> >> Hi Alexey,
> >>
> >> Please use the attached patch to improve TX throughput. We will be
> >> submitting this patch along with few others soon.
> > Could you please specify which branch this patch is based on?
> > I tried to apply on 4.14.5 (whatever is latests in "linux-4.14.y")
> > but first 3 hunks failed to apply.
> It is based on 4.14.0-rc7+
> >
> > Maybe there're other dependencies?
> >
> > Also a couple of questions about this patch.
> > Even though I'm not a networking/Wi-Fi expert of any kind but just
> > looking at your changes:
> >
> > 1. I assume for upstreaming that patch will be split in 5 seperate patches
> > each addressing its own item instead of doing all at once, right?
> >
> > 2. The only obvious change that might help me with bandwidth is increase
> > of a number of aggregated Tx frames. But bumping from 6 to 8 doesn't look
> > as a significant improvement. How that might bring Tx bandwidth at least to
> > what I see on Rx, i.e. make things 10 times faster?
>
> The significant change to improve performance is bootup parameters
> update as below:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_boot_params.h
> b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_boot_params.h
> index 238ee96..ad903b22 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_boot_params.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/rsi/rsi_boot_params.h
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@
> (((TA_PLL_M_VAL_20 + 1) * 40) / \
> ((TA_PLL_N_VAL_20 + 1) * (TA_PLL_P_VAL_20 + 1)))
> #define VALID_20 \
> - (WIFI_PLL960_CONFIGS | WIFI_AFEPLL_CONFIGS |
> WIFI_SWITCH_CLK_CONFIGS)
> + (WIFI_TAPLL_CONFIGS | WIFI_PLL960_CONFIGS | WIFI_AFEPLL_CONFIGS | \
> + WIFI_SWITCH_CLK_CONFIGS | BOOTUP_MODE_INFO | CRYSTAL_GOOD_TIME)
> #define UMAC_CLK_40BW \
> (((TA_PLL_M_VAL_40 + 1) * 40) / \
> ((TA_PLL_N_VAL_40 + 1) * (TA_PLL_P_VAL_40 + 1)))
>
With this change alone I don't see any improvement, see iperf3 results before this change:
--------------------------->8-------------------------
Accepted connection from 10.42.1.85, port 33814
[ 5] local 10.42.1.1 port 5201 connected to 10.42.1.85 port 33816
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 14.1 KBytes 116 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 11.3 KBytes 92.7 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 11.3 KBytes 92.7 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 10.00-11.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 11.00-12.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 12.00-12.44 sec 5.66 KBytes 107 Kbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-12.44 sec 157 KBytes 103 Kbits/sec receiver
Accepted connection from 10.42.1.85, port 33818
[ 5] local 10.42.1.1 port 5201 connected to 10.42.1.85 port 33820
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 296 KBytes 2.42 Mbits/sec 0 41.0 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 137 KBytes 1.12 Mbits/sec 0 46.7 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 127 KBytes 1.04 Mbits/sec 0 53.7 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 127 KBytes 1.04 Mbits/sec 0 62.2 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 191 KBytes 1.56 Mbits/sec 0 82.0 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 191 KBytes 1.56 Mbits/sec 0 113 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 573 KBytes 4.69 Mbits/sec 0 158 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 187 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 445 KBytes 3.65 Mbits/sec 0 243 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 636 KBytes 5.22 Mbits/sec 0 298 KBytes
[ 5] 10.00-11.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 362 KBytes
[ 5] 11.00-12.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 399 KBytes
[ 5] 12.00-12.87 sec 827 KBytes 7.80 Mbits/sec 0 455 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-12.87 sec 3.47 MBytes 2.26 Mbits/sec 0 sender
--------------------------->8-------------------------
and right after:
--------------------------->8-------------------------
Accepted connection from 10.42.1.85, port 60582
[ 5] local 10.42.1.1 port 5201 connected to 10.42.1.85 port 60584
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 10.00-11.00 sec 12.7 KBytes 104 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 11.00-12.00 sec 14.1 KBytes 116 Kbits/sec
[ 5] 12.00-12.51 sec 5.66 KBytes 90.5 Kbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-12.51 sec 160 KBytes 105 Kbits/sec receiver
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 10.42.1.85, port 60586
[ 5] local 10.42.1.1 port 5201 connected to 10.42.1.85 port 60588
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 296 KBytes 2.42 Mbits/sec 0 42.4 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 137 KBytes 1.12 Mbits/sec 0 48.1 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 127 KBytes 1.04 Mbits/sec 0 53.7 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 127 KBytes 1.04 Mbits/sec 0 62.2 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 318 KBytes 2.61 Mbits/sec 0 80.6 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 255 KBytes 2.08 Mbits/sec 0 112 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 318 KBytes 2.61 Mbits/sec 0 153 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 188 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 509 KBytes 4.17 Mbits/sec 0 233 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 270 KBytes
[ 5] 10.00-11.00 sec 573 KBytes 4.69 Mbits/sec 0 345 KBytes
[ 5] 11.00-12.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 387 KBytes
[ 5] 12.00-12.66 sec 954 KBytes 11.8 Mbits/sec 0 414 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-12.66 sec 3.53 MBytes 2.34 Mbits/sec 0 sender
--------------------------->8-------------------------
Any ideas?
Does it really work for you (again I'm trying on top of linux-4.14.y)?
> >
> > Also while at it I'm wondering why 5GHz mode didn't work for me even though
> > "iw list" reports 5 GHz mode supported:
> > ----------------------->8------------------
> > # iw list
> > Wiphy phy0
> > ...
> > Frequencies:
> > * 5180 MHz [36] (20.0 dBm) (no IR)
> >
> > # cat /etc/hostapd.conf
> > interface=wlan0
> > ctrl_interface=/var/run/hostapd
> > ctrl_interface_group=0
> > ssid=HSDK-AP
> > hw_mode=a
> > channel=36
> >
> > # hostapd -B /etc/hostapd.conf
> > Starting hostapd: Configuration file: /etc/hostapd.conf
> > rsi_91x: ===> Interface UP <===
> > rfkill: Cannot open RFKILL contrIPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
> > ol device
> > wlan0: IEEE 802.11 Configured channel (36) not found from the channel list of current mode (2) IEEE 802.11a
> > wlan0: IEEE 802.11 Hardware does not support configured channel
> > Could not select hw_mode and channel. (-3)
> > wlan0: interface state UNINITIALIZED->DISABLED
> > wlan0: AP-DISABLED
> > wlan0: Unable to setup interface.
> > wlan0: interface state DISABLED->DISABLED
> > wlan0: AP-DISABLED
> > hostapd_free_hapd_data: Interface wlan0 wasn't started
> > ----------------------->8------------------
> It should work without any issues. I hope you have dual band module with
> you. Please confirm once.
1. How may I tell the module supports 5GHz?
2. If it doesn't support 5GHz why iw reports this support?
-Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists