[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27ce28d5-4e1e-f83e-f413-b297bbc1a2cc@xs4all.nl>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:16:42 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: fabien.dessenne@...com,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Cc: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bdisp: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in
bdisp_hw_reset
Fabien or Benjamin, can you take a look at these two patches?
I'm a bit hesitant applying this since e.g. this bdisp_hw_reset() function might wait
for up to a second, which is a mite long for an interrupt :-)
Regards,
Hans
On 12/12/17 14:47, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The driver may sleep under a spinlock.
> The function call path is:
> bdisp_device_run (acquire the spinlock)
> bdisp_hw_reset
> msleep --> may sleep
>
> To fix it, msleep is replaced with mdelay.
>
> This bug is found by my static analysis tool(DSAC) and checked by my code review.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
> index b7892f3..4b62ceb 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int bdisp_hw_reset(struct bdisp_dev *bdisp)
> for (i = 0; i < POLL_RST_MAX; i++) {
> if (readl(bdisp->regs + BLT_STA1) & BLT_STA1_IDLE)
> break;
> - msleep(POLL_RST_DELAY_MS);
> + mdelay(POLL_RST_DELAY_MS);
> }
> if (i == POLL_RST_MAX)
> dev_err(bdisp->dev, "Reset timeout\n");
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists