[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <489e7b01-a484-1c13-554f-fc32cdbf9bc7@st.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:53:27 +0000
From: Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@...com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Benjamin GAIGNARD" <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bdisp: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in
bdisp_hw_save_request
Hi
Thank you for the patch.
On 12/12/17 14:47, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The driver may sleep under a spinlock.
> The function call path is:
> bdisp_device_run (acquire the spinlock)
> bdisp_hw_update
> bdisp_hw_save_request
> devm_kzalloc(GFP_KERNEL) --> may sleep
>
> To fix it, GFP_KERNEL is replaced with GFP_ATOMIC.
>
> This bug is found by my static analysis tool(DSAC) and checked by my code review.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
> index 4b62ceb..7b45b43 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
> @@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ static void bdisp_hw_save_request(struct bdisp_ctx *ctx)
> if (!copy_node[i]) {
> copy_node[i] = devm_kzalloc(ctx->bdisp_dev->dev,
> sizeof(*copy_node[i]),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!copy_node[i])
> return;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists