linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Correct obsolete comment about cpufreq_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171215153944.220146-2-joelaf@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:39:43 -0800
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
        Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@....com>,
        Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Morten Ramussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Saravana Kannan <skannan@...cinc.com>,
        Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@...eaurora.org>,
        Rohit Jain <rohit.k.jain@...cle.com>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@...cle.com>,
        Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
        EAS Dev <eas-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Android Kernel <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] sched/fair: Correct obsolete comment about cpufreq_update_util

Since the remote cpufreq callback work, the cpufreq_update_util call can happen
from remote CPUs. The comment about local CPUs is thus obsolete. Update it
accordingly.

Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2fe3aa853e4d..1b10821d8380 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3020,9 +3020,7 @@ static inline void cfs_rq_util_change(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 		/*
 		 * There are a few boundary cases this might miss but it should
 		 * get called often enough that that should (hopefully) not be
-		 * a real problem -- added to that it only calls on the local
-		 * CPU, so if we enqueue remotely we'll miss an update, but
-		 * the next tick/schedule should update.
+		 * a real problem.
 		 *
 		 * It will not get called when we go idle, because the idle
 		 * thread is a different class (!fair), nor will the utilization
-- 
2.15.1.504.g5279b80103-goog