[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d63fa041-ce36-3c1b-3d8b-87b4c5c4b84f@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:55:46 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@...cle.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, roger.pau@...rix.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, hch@...radead.org, JBeulich@...e.com,
x86@...nel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry
point
On 13/12/17 00:42, Maran Wilson wrote:
> For certain applications it is desirable to rapidly boot a KVM virtual
> machine. In cases where legacy hardware and software support within the
> guest is not needed, Qemu should be able to boot directly into the
> uncompressed Linux kernel binary without the need to run firmware.
>
> There already exists an ABI to allow this for Xen PVH guests and the ABI
> is supported by Linux and FreeBSD:
>
> https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/pvh.html
>
> This patch enables Qemu to use that same entry point for booting KVM
> guests.
I'm fine with the general idea.
I'm wondering whether you really want to require CONFIG_XEN for the
KVM case, though.
Wouldn't it be better to rename arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c to
arch/x86/pvh.c and arch/x86/xen/xen-pvh.S to arch/x86/pvh-head.S,
put both under CONFIG_PVH umbrella and select this from CONFIG_XEN_PVH
and KVM_PVH (or what you like to call it)?
In the two moved source files you can make Xen/KVM-specific parts
optional via their CONFIG_ options.
And you might want to add an own ELF note for the KVM case?
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> index 98ab176..12f3716 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c
> @@ -31,21 +31,38 @@ static void xen_pvh_arch_setup(void)
> acpi_irq_model = ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_PLATFORM;
> }
>
> -static void __init init_pvh_bootparams(void)
> +static void __init init_pvh_bootparams(bool xen_guest)
> {
> struct xen_memory_map memmap;
> int rc;
>
> memset(&pvh_bootparams, 0, sizeof(pvh_bootparams));
>
> - memmap.nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(pvh_bootparams.e820_table);
> - set_xen_guest_handle(memmap.buffer, pvh_bootparams.e820_table);
> - rc = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_memory_map, &memmap);
> - if (rc) {
> - xen_raw_printk("XENMEM_memory_map failed (%d)\n", rc);
> + if ((pvh_start_info.version > 0) && (pvh_start_info.memmap_entries)) {
> + struct hvm_memmap_table_entry *ep;
> + int i;
> +
> + ep = __va(pvh_start_info.memmap_paddr);
> + pvh_bootparams.e820_entries = pvh_start_info.memmap_entries;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < pvh_bootparams.e820_entries ; i++, ep++) {
> + pvh_bootparams.e820_table[i].addr = ep->addr;
> + pvh_bootparams.e820_table[i].size = ep->size;
> + pvh_bootparams.e820_table[i].type = ep->type;
> + }
> + } else if (xen_guest) {
> + memmap.nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(pvh_bootparams.e820_table);
> + set_xen_guest_handle(memmap.buffer, pvh_bootparams.e820_table);
> + rc = HYPERVISOR_memory_op(XENMEM_memory_map, &memmap);
> + if (rc) {
> + xen_raw_printk("XENMEM_memory_map failed (%d)\n", rc);
> + BUG();
> + }
> + pvh_bootparams.e820_entries = memmap.nr_entries;
> + } else {
> + xen_raw_printk("Error: Could not find memory map\n");
xen_raw_printk() without being a Xen guest?
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists