| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7bb4e955-f3e5-d22f-4e78-eac97e66a9a6@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:36:35 -0600
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
will.deacon@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, jhugo@...eaurora.org,
wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com, Jonathan.Zhang@...ium.com,
ahs3@...hat.com, Jayachandran.Nair@...ium.com,
austinwc@...eaurora.org, lenb@...nel.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/9] arm64: Topology, rename cluster_id
Hi,
On 12/13/2017 12:02 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> [+Morten, Dietmar]
>
> $SUBJECT should be:
>
> arm64: topology: rename cluster_id
Sure..
>
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:23:28PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>> Lets match the name of the arm64 topology field
>> to the kernel macro that uses it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 4 ++--
>> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
>> index c4f2d50491eb..118136268f66 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
>> @@ -7,14 +7,14 @@
>> struct cpu_topology {
>> int thread_id;
>> int core_id;
>> - int cluster_id;
>> + int physical_id;
>
> package_id ?
Given the macro is topology_physical_package_id, either makes sense to
me. <shrug> I will change it in the next set.
>
> It has been debated before, I know. Should we keep the cluster_id too
> (even if it would be 1:1 mapped to package_id - for now) ?
Well given that this patch replaces the patch that did that at your
request..
I was hoping someone else would comment here, but my take at this point
is that it doesn't really matter in a functional sense at the moment.
Like the chiplet discussion it can be the subject of a future patch
along with the patches which tweak the scheduler to understand the split.
BTW, given that i'm OoO next week, and the following that are the
holidays, I don't intend to repost this for a couple weeks. I don't
think there are any issues with this set.
>
> There is also arch/arm to take into account, again, this patch is
> just renaming (as it should have named since the beginning) a
> topology level but we should consider everything from a legacy
> perspective.
>
> Lorenzo
>
>> cpumask_t thread_sibling;
>> cpumask_t core_sibling;
>> };
>>
>> extern struct cpu_topology cpu_topology[NR_CPUS];
>>
>> -#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id)
>> +#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id)
>> #define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_topology[cpu].core_id)
>> #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling)
>> #define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu) (&cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
>> index 8d48b233e6ce..74a8a5173a35 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
>> +static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int physical_id,
>> int core_id)
>> {
>> char name[10];
>> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
>> leaf = false;
>> cpu = get_cpu_for_node(t);
>> if (cpu >= 0) {
>> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = cluster_id;
>> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = physical_id;
>> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = core_id;
>> cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = i;
>> } else {
>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int __init parse_core(struct device_node *core, int cluster_id,
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = cluster_id;
>> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = physical_id;
>> cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = core_id;
>> } else if (leaf) {
>> pr_err("%pOF: Can't get CPU for leaf core\n", core);
>> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
>> bool leaf = true;
>> bool has_cores = false;
>> struct device_node *c;
>> - static int cluster_id __initdata;
>> + static int physical_id __initdata;
>> int core_id = 0;
>> int i, ret;
>>
>> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
>> }
>>
>> if (leaf) {
>> - ret = parse_core(c, cluster_id, core_id++);
>> + ret = parse_core(c, physical_id, core_id++);
>> } else {
>> pr_err("%pOF: Non-leaf cluster with core %s\n",
>> cluster, name);
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int __init parse_cluster(struct device_node *cluster, int depth)
>> pr_warn("%pOF: empty cluster\n", cluster);
>>
>> if (leaf)
>> - cluster_id++;
>> + physical_id++;
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static int __init parse_dt_topology(void)
>> * only mark cores described in the DT as possible.
>> */
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>> - if (cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id == -1)
>> + if (cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id == -1)
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>>
>> out_map:
>> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
>>
>> - if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id != cpu_topo->cluster_id)
>> + if (cpuid_topo->physical_id != cpu_topo->physical_id)
>> continue;
>>
>> cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
>> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
>> struct cpu_topology *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
>> u64 mpidr;
>>
>> - if (cpuid_topo->cluster_id != -1)
>> + if (cpuid_topo->physical_id != -1)
>> goto topology_populated;
>>
>> mpidr = read_cpuid_mpidr();
>> @@ -263,19 +263,19 @@ void store_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid)
>> /* Multiprocessor system : Multi-threads per core */
>> cpuid_topo->thread_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
>> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1);
>> - cpuid_topo->cluster_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) |
>> + cpuid_topo->physical_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) |
>> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 3) << 8;
>> } else {
>> /* Multiprocessor system : Single-thread per core */
>> cpuid_topo->thread_id = -1;
>> cpuid_topo->core_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
>> - cpuid_topo->cluster_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) |
>> + cpuid_topo->physical_id = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 1) |
>> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 2) << 8 |
>> MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 3) << 16;
>> }
>>
>> pr_debug("CPU%u: cluster %d core %d thread %d mpidr %#016llx\n",
>> - cpuid, cpuid_topo->cluster_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
>> + cpuid, cpuid_topo->physical_id, cpuid_topo->core_id,
>> cpuid_topo->thread_id, mpidr);
>>
>> topology_populated:
>> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
>>
>> cpu_topo->thread_id = -1;
>> cpu_topo->core_id = 0;
>> - cpu_topo->cluster_id = -1;
>> + cpu_topo->physical_id = -1;
>>
>> cpumask_clear(&cpu_topo->core_sibling);
>> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
>> @@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +
>> void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
>> {
>> reset_cpu_topology();
>> --
>> 2.13.5
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists