[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <abd7b14d-cda6-ab67-3c5b-7cbd0dbaa336@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 19:53:55 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: Fabien DESSENNE <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@...com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bdisp: Fix a possible sleep-in-atomic bug in
bdisp_hw_reset
Hi,
On 2017/12/15 22:51, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 12/12/17 14:47, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> The driver may sleep under a spinlock.
>> The function call path is:
>> bdisp_device_run (acquire the spinlock)
>> bdisp_hw_reset
>> msleep --> may sleep
>>
>> To fix it, msleep is replaced with mdelay.
> May I suggest you to use readl_poll_timeout_atomic (instead of the whole
> "for" block): this fixes the problem and simplifies the code?
Okay, I have submitted a patch according to your advice.
You can have a look :)
Thanks,
Jia-Ju Bai
>> This bug is found by my static analysis tool(DSAC) and checked by my code review.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
>> index b7892f3..4b62ceb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
>> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int bdisp_hw_reset(struct bdisp_dev *bdisp)
>> for (i = 0; i < POLL_RST_MAX; i++) {
>> if (readl(bdisp->regs + BLT_STA1) & BLT_STA1_IDLE)
>> break;
>> - msleep(POLL_RST_DELAY_MS);
>> + mdelay(POLL_RST_DELAY_MS);
>> }
>> if (i == POLL_RST_MAX)
>> dev_err(bdisp->dev, "Reset timeout\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists