[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171216235025.4e0e637ad4689728d8bf1901@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 23:50:25 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: guzhifeng <guzhifeng@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc: ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/kprobes: kprobes_built_in can be boolean
On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:41:12 +0800
guzhifeng <guzhifeng@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> This patch makes kprobes_built_in return bool due to this
> particular function only using either one or zero as its return
> value.
>
> No functional change.
This seems OK to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thank you,
>
> Signed-off-by: guzhifeng <guzhifeng@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> index 9440a2f..8d0d910 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -219,9 +219,9 @@ struct kprobe_blacklist_entry {
> /*
> * For #ifdef avoidance:
> */
> -static inline int kprobes_built_in(void)
> +static inline bool kprobes_built_in(void)
> {
> - return 1;
> + return true;
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
> @@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ static inline struct kprobe_ctlblk *get_kprobe_ctlblk(void)
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_KPROBES: */
>
> -static inline int kprobes_built_in(void)
> +static inline bool kprobes_built_in(void)
> {
> - return 0;
> + return false;
> }
> static inline int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
> {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists