lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1513437230.4647.25.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Dec 2017 07:13:50 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] checkpatch: Improve --fix-inplace for TABSTOP

On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote:
> If the --fix-inplace option for TABSTOP encounters a sitation with several
> spaces (but less than 8) at the end of an indentation, it will assume that there
> are extra indentation and align back to the nearest tabstop instead of the next.
> 
> This might go undetected in a "full" checkpatch --fix-inplace run, as this
> potential new error will be handled by SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT further down in the
> script.  The code for TABSTOP have limited "knowledge" of the previous line.
> Adding complexity when it is taken care of later anyway is maybe unnecessary/undesired.
> As a simple heuristics just use a "natural" rounding algorithm and round
> up for 4 spaces or more.
> 
> There's an example in line 108 in net/rds/ib_recv.c with indentation TAB + 7
> spaces where the correct would have been an additional TAB.  With only TABSTOP
> enabled, checkpatch will fix this to a single TAB, which is visually worse IMO.
> 
> Reported-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Håkon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>

Well written commit log description, thanks but
I'm not sure that's actually better overall.

It's not possible to know if the appropriate thing
to do is to add a tab or remove spaces.

This may get it wrong about as often as the current
code gets it right.

Last I checked 6 months or so ago, there were ~8000
TABSTOP warnings in the kernel tree.

Most of those still seem valid and moving additional
places to the right is sometimes incorrect too.

It seems most common when there are 3 or 4 spaces
used as indent level indentation instead of tabs.

Dunno.

Anyone else have an opinion?

> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 040aa79..febe010 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2989,7 +2989,7 @@ sub process {
>  				if (WARN("TABSTOP",
>  					 "Statements should start on a tabstop\n" . $herecurr) &&
>  				    $fix) {
> -					$fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s@(^\+\t+) +@$1 . "\t" x ($indent/8)@e;
> +					$fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s@(^\+\t+) +@$1 . "\t" x (($indent+4)/8)@e;
>  				}
>  			}
>  		}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ