linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] thunderbolt fixes for v4.15-rc2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171216161130.GA21243@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Dec 2017 17:11:30 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] thunderbolt fixes for v4.15-rc2

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 10:50:21AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 09:52:50AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:49:13AM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:08:02PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > 
> > > > Here are two Thunderbolt fixes and one related MAINTAINERS update for the
> > > > next -rc:
> > > > 
> > > > - Use shorter path for force_power attribute in thunderbolt.rst
> > > > - Ring interrupts were not masked properly when Rx polling starts
> > > > - Add thunderbolt.rst to the Thunderbolt driver MAINTAINERS entry
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Hi Greg,
> > > 
> > > I wonder if I missed something in this series? These are fixes I picked
> > > up to my tree and then forwarded to you to be included in your char-misc
> > > repository for -rc.
> > 
> > I was traveling all last week, please give me a chance to catch up on
> > patches :)
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Any change to get these fixes for next -rc? They have been on relevant
> mailing list since v4.15-rc1 and all Thunderbolt maintainers have seen
> them. I picked them up to our Thunderbolt tree and forwarded to you.
> Isn't that how the process is supposed to work?

Yeah, sorry for the delay, I knew I just had to get them in before
-final, so they were at the bottom of the pile.  Now queued up.

greg k-h