linux-kernel - Re: tps65090-charger: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf645236-d4da-a52c-216a-248d76a61025@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Sat, 16 Dec 2017 21:47:34 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tps65090-charger: Delete an error message for a failed memory
 allocation in two functions

>> I am still waiting for possibilities to improve also the corresponding
>> reference documentation somehow as you know it already.
> 
> If you require someone else to update the documentation to be able to
> explain why the patch is useful,

My approach is to refer to the Linux allocation failure report.


> then it would seem that you do not know why the patch is useful,
> and thus should not submit it.

We tried to clarify other explanation approaches a few times.

But it seems that we are stuck with specific software aspects.
How would you like to see remaining open issues to be resolved there anyhow?

Regards,
Markus