[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1730241.78TPuThRce@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 03:35:58 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] sched/cpufreq_schedutil: use util_est for OPP selection
On Tuesday, December 5, 2017 6:10:18 PM CET Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> When schedutil looks at the CPU utilization, the current PELT value for
> that CPU is returned straight away. In certain scenarios this can have
> undesired side effects and delays on frequency selection.
>
> For example, since the task utilization is decayed at wakeup time, a
> long sleeping big task newly enqueued does not add immediately a
> significant contribution to the target CPU. This introduces some latency
> before schedutil will be able to detect the best frequency required by
> that task.
>
> Moreover, the PELT signal build-up time is function of the current
> frequency, because of the scale invariant load tracking support. Thus,
> starting from a lower frequency, the utilization build-up time will
> increase even more and further delays the selection of the actual
> frequency which better serves the task requirements.
>
> In order to reduce these kind of latencies, this patch integrates the
> usage of the CPU's estimated utilization in the sugov_get_util function.
>
> The estimated utilization of a CPU is defined to be the maximum between
> its PELT's utilization and the sum of the estimated utilization of each
> currently RUNNABLE task on that CPU.
> This allows to properly represent the expected utilization of a CPU which,
> for example, has just got a big task running after a long sleep period,
> and ultimately it allows to select the best frequency to run a task
> right after it wakes up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
>
> ---
> Changes v1->v2:
> - rebase on top of v4.15-rc2
> - tested that overhauled PELT code does not affect the util_est
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 2f52ec0f1539..465430d99440 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,11 @@ static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max, int cpu)
>
> cfs_max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu);
>
> - *util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg, cfs_max);
> + *util = rq->cfs.avg.util_avg;
I would use a local variable here.
That *util everywhere looks a bit dirtyish.
> + if (sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
> + *util = max(*util, rq->cfs.util_est_runnable);
> + *util = min(*util, cfs_max);
> +
> *max = cfs_max;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists