linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rtc: cros-ec: add cros-ec-rtc driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171216045750.GB52366@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:57:50 -0800
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, bleung@...omium.org,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rtc: cros-ec: add cros-ec-rtc driver.

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 10:55:53PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>
> 
> On platforms with a Chrome OS EC, the EC can function as a simple RTC.
> Add a basic driver with this functionality.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Barber <smbarber@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/Kconfig       |  10 ++
>  drivers/rtc/Makefile      |   1 +
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c | 413 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 424 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c

This isn't quite super-helpful without the CrOS-EC / MFD additions to
actually create the device, but it's a good start, and I don't see any
problems with it. Any reason this isn't merged? Are the RTC maintainers
intendending to merge this, or should Lee (for the MFD header)? I
thought normally Lee deferred to other subsystem maintainers when the
only "MFD" stuff was a simple header change (such as in patch 1).

Anyway, FWIW:

Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>