linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/105] 4.4.106-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYu+ZysEPOUivgiPONaihx=TRrC1DKfynRCq4f3SJiu+pA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Dec 2017 11:06:57 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Gall <tom.gall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/105] 4.4.106-stable review

On 15 December 2017 at 15:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.106 release.
> There are 105 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun Dec 17 09:22:39 UTC 2017.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.106-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64.

NOTE:
We do not have arm64 hikey board results due to the changes required
from the firmware update. Hikey board is under maintenance.

readahead02 failed once in 3 iterations of full syscall run which is
intermittently failure on ARM64 juno running 4.4.106-rc1.
Resubmitted test looped for 20 Iterations out of which 7 times TCONF
and 13 times PASS.

Test log failed instance:
  readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(0) used cache: 65468 kB
  readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(1) used cache: 32592 kB
  readahead02    0  TWARN  :  readahead02.c:351: using less cache than expected

Test pass log:
  readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(0) used cache: 65568 kB
  readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(1) used cache: 65268 kB
  readahead02    3  TPASS  :  using cache as expected

Test CONF log:
  readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(0) used cache: 65376 kB
  readahead02    0  TINFO  :  read_testfile(1) used cache: 65564 kB
  readahead02    3  TCONF  :  readahead02.c:354: Page cache on your
system is too small to hold whole testfile.

Bug reported for the investigation.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3539

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.4.106-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.4.y
git commit: 67065bd41780929c2b8406ac3dd5356e83cd2d19
git describe: v4.4.105-106-g67065bd41780
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.105-106-g67065bd41780

No regressions (compared to build v4.4.105-108-g894d367e5d93)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Boards, architectures and test suites:
-------------------------------------

juno-r2 - arm64
* boot - pass: 20,
* kselftest - pass: 32, skip: 29
* libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 28, skip: 36
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60,
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22,
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 14,
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - fail: 2, pass: 980, skip: 124
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,

x15 - arm
* boot - pass: 20,
* kselftest - pass: 31, skip: 29
* libhugetlbfs - pass: 87, skip: 1
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 60,
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 20, skip: 2
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 13, skip: 1
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 1035, skip: 67
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,

x86_64
* boot - pass: 20,
* kselftest - pass: 44, skip: 32
* libhugetlbfs - pass: 90, skip: 1
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-containers-tests - pass: 64,
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-filecaps-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs-tests - pass: 61, skip: 1
* ltp-fs_bind-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests - pass: 19,
* ltp-fsx-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-hugetlb-tests - pass: 22,
* ltp-io-tests - pass: 3,
* ltp-ipc-tests - pass: 9,
* ltp-math-tests - pass: 11,
* ltp-nptl-tests - pass: 2,
* ltp-pty-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-sched-tests - pass: 9, skip: 1
* ltp-securebits-tests - pass: 4,
* ltp-syscalls-tests - pass: 956, skip: 164
* ltp-timers-tests - pass: 12,

Documentation - https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/LKFT/Email+Reports
Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>