[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ba3e337e-6442-b1fe-cab9-c0a863c35015@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 12:32:39 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Watchdog Mailing List <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog - v4.15 Fixes
On 12/17/2017 12:12 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Once more, gmail hated you. No real indication why, apart from:
>
> Why is this message in Spam? We've found that lots of messages from
> iguana.be are spam.
>
> I have no idea why that site is so hated, but one option that your
> upstream ISP is some scumbag place that allows spammers and scammers
> and thus the addresses end up being on some blacklist.
>
> Also, all of these commits were committed less than an hour before
> sending me the pull request, so I question the kind of testing they
> got..
>
The patches have been in -next for a while, only Wim moved them
into a different branch to be able to send you a pull request.
In -next:
8e1828d605df watchdog: hpwdt: SMBIOS check
ee11fc2b6e73 watchdog: indydog: Add dependency on SGI_HAS_INDYDOG
bff862153935 watchdog: Fix kref imbalance seen if handle_boot_enabled=0
01cd17d9fe08 watchdog: Fix potential kref imbalance when opening watchdog
You might as well blame me since I asked Wim to either send those patches
to you or to let me do it, and I would have pulled the patches from Wim's
watchdog-next repository (or from linux-next) as well.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists