[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171218152921.196644641@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:47:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 015/178] ovl: Pass ovl_get_nlink() parameters in right order
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
commit 08d8f8a5b094b66b29936e8751b4a818b8db1207 upstream.
Right now we seem to be passing index as "lowerdentry" and origin.dentry
as "upperdentry". IIUC, we should pass these parameters in reversed order
and this looks like a bug.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Fixes: caf70cb2ba5d ("ovl: cleanup orphan index entries")
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/overlayfs/namei.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/namei.c
@@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ int ovl_verify_index(struct dentry *inde
/* Check if index is orphan and don't warn before cleaning it */
if (d_inode(index)->i_nlink == 1 &&
- ovl_get_nlink(index, origin.dentry, 0) == 0)
+ ovl_get_nlink(origin.dentry, index, 0) == 0)
err = -ENOENT;
dput(origin.dentry);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists