[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171218152918.208349505@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:49:41 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 158/177] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Fix incorrect comparison in memord
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
[ Upstream commit 05c14c03138532a3cb2aa29c2960445c8753343b ]
In the hv-24x7 code there is a function memord() which tries to
implement a sort function return -1, 0, 1. However one of the
conditions is incorrect, such that it can never be true, because we
will have already returned.
I don't believe there is a bug in practice though, because the
comparisons are an optimisation prior to calling memcmp().
Fix it by swapping the second comparision, so it can be true.
Reported-by: David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ static int memord(const void *d1, size_t
{
if (s1 < s2)
return 1;
- if (s2 > s1)
+ if (s1 > s2)
return -1;
return memcmp(d1, d2, s1);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists