lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171218152912.359167344@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:47:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 047/177] netfilter: bridge: honor frag_max_size when refragmenting

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>


[ Upstream commit 4ca60d08cbe65f501baad64af50fceba79c19fbb ]

consider a bridge with mtu 9000, but end host sending smaller
packets to another host with mtu < 9000.

In this case, after reassembly, bridge+defrag would refragment,
and then attempt to send the reassembled packet as long as it
was below 9k.

Instead we have to cap by the largest fragment size seen.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -706,18 +706,20 @@ static unsigned int nf_bridge_mtu_reduct
 
 static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge;
-	unsigned int mtu_reserved;
+	struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
+	unsigned int mtu, mtu_reserved;
 
 	mtu_reserved = nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(skb);
+	mtu = skb->dev->mtu;
 
-	if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= skb->dev->mtu) {
+	if (nf_bridge->frag_max_size && nf_bridge->frag_max_size < mtu)
+		mtu = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
+
+	if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= mtu) {
 		nf_bridge_info_free(skb);
 		return br_dev_queue_push_xmit(net, sk, skb);
 	}
 
-	nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
-
 	/* This is wrong! We should preserve the original fragment
 	 * boundaries by preserving frag_list rather than refragmenting.
 	 */


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ