linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was "attached"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:42:36 -0800
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Cheng-yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
        Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.15] ASoC: rt5514: don't assume rt5514 component was
 "attached"

Hi!

(By the way, your mail is HTML and likely will get rejected by many
mailing lists and/or people reading these mailing lists.)

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:23:18PM +0800, Cheng-yi Chiang wrote:
>    Hi Brian,
>      Oder has posted the same fix : [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/
>    patch/10066257/ and it has been applied.

OK cool. Obviously I'm biased, but I prefer mine, as it has less
needless whitespace, and is appropriately documented ;) But it should be
a fine replacement.

>    Perhaps you can cherry-pick it to v4.15 ?

I have no say in that; that would be up to Mark, I think. It's most
certainly a regression in 4.15-rc1, so IMO it should be given a proper
'Fixes: e9c50aa6bd39 ("ASoC: rt5514-spi: check irq status to schedule
data copy in resume function")' tag and sent for 4.15, not 4.16.

Brian