[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdwfFwHyOFpkA+g0QNZJueiToKt+AODdVmYu2X1o6HFvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 18:45:47 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeprom: at24: code shrink
2017-12-10 20:29 GMT+01:00 Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>:
> A regmap_config struct is pretty big and declaring two of them
> statically just to tweak the reg_bits value adds unnecessary bloat.
>
> Declare the regmap config locally in at24_probe() instead.
>
> Bloat-o-meter output:
>
> add/remove: 0/2 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 20/-272 (-252)
> Function old new delta
> at24_probe 1564 1584 +20
> regmap_config_8 136 - -136
> regmap_config_16 136 - -136
> Total: Before=7010, After=6758, chg -3.59%
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
> ---
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 27 ++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> index ded86474b3de..5ecddbc74732 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
> @@ -518,20 +518,6 @@ static void at24_regmap_lock_unlock_none(void *map)
>
> }
>
> -static const struct regmap_config regmap_config_8 = {
> - .reg_bits = 8,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> - .lock = at24_regmap_lock_unlock_none,
> - .unlock = at24_regmap_lock_unlock_none,
> -};
> -
> -static const struct regmap_config regmap_config_16 = {
> - .reg_bits = 16,
> - .val_bits = 8,
> - .lock = at24_regmap_lock_unlock_none,
> - .unlock = at24_regmap_lock_unlock_none,
> -};
> -
> static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> {
> struct at24_platform_data chip;
> @@ -540,7 +526,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> struct at24_data *at24;
> int err;
> unsigned i, num_addresses;
> - const struct regmap_config *config;
> + struct regmap_config config = { };
> u8 test_byte;
>
> if (client->dev.platform_data) {
> @@ -609,10 +595,9 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> num_addresses = DIV_ROUND_UP(chip.byte_len,
> (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) ? 65536 : 256);
>
> - if (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16)
> - config = ®map_config_16;
> - else
> - config = ®map_config_8;
> + config.val_bits = 8;
> + config.lock = config.unlock = at24_regmap_lock_unlock_none;
> + config.reg_bits = (chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_ADDR16) ? 16 : 8;
>
> at24 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(struct at24_data) +
> num_addresses * sizeof(struct at24_client), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -625,7 +610,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> at24->offset_adj = at24_get_offset_adj(chip.flags, chip.byte_len);
>
> at24->client[0].client = client;
> - at24->client[0].regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, config);
> + at24->client[0].regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &config);
> if (IS_ERR(at24->client[0].regmap))
> return PTR_ERR(at24->client[0].regmap);
>
> @@ -654,7 +639,7 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> goto err_clients;
> }
> at24->client[i].regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(
> - at24->client[i].client, config);
> + at24->client[i].client, &config);
> if (IS_ERR(at24->client[i].regmap)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(at24->client[i].regmap);
> goto err_clients;
> --
> 2.15.1
>
There were no more comments, so patch applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists