[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <770be6e8-f97e-fd95-562c-3973f2faf542@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:21:24 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] PNP: Adjustments for four function implementations
> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 21:03:21 +0200
>
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (6):
> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in pnp_alloc()
> Improve a size determination in pnp_alloc_dev()
> Improve a size determination in pnp_clone_dependent_set()
> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in pnp_clone_dependent_set()
> Improve a size determination in quirk_awe32_add_ports()
> Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in quirk_awe32_add_ports()
>
> drivers/pnp/core.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/pnp/quirks.c | 15 ++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
How are the chances that such change possibilities will be integrated
in this software module?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists