[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e34cfd7a-73d3-f9a7-1940-6b6a892a5fe9@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:45:13 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirsky <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, keescook@...gle.com,
hughd@...gle.com, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduval@...zon.com>, aliguori@...zon.com,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, daniel.gruss@...k.tugraz.at,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V163 27/51] x86/mm/pti: Populate user PGD
On 12/18/2017 12:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> I also don't think the user_shared area of the fixmap can get *that*
>> big. Does anybody know offhand what the theoretical limits are there?
> Problem there is the nr_cpus term I think, we currently have up to 8k
> CPUs, but I can see that getting bigger in the future.
It only matters if we go over 512GB, though. Is the per-cpu part of the
fixmap ever more than 512GB/8k=64MB?
In any case, it's not hard to make a little loop. I think the common
case, at least is that we only do 4 PGDs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists