[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171218214249.GA15162@piout.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 22:42:49 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Andreas Platschek <andreas.platschek@...ntech.at>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: omap: check for clk_prepare_enable() error
On 06/12/2017 at 20:42:37 +0100, Andreas Platschek wrote:
> clk_prepare_enable() returns an error -> check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Platschek <andreas.platschek@...ntech.at>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> index 1d666ac9ef70..ad309feb7d11 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c
> @@ -748,8 +748,15 @@ static int omap_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> else
> rtc->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "int-clk");
>
> - if (!IS_ERR(rtc->clk))
> - clk_prepare_enable(rtc->clk);
> + if (!IS_ERR(rtc->clk)) {
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(rtc->clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Failed to enable rtc clk (%u)\n", ret);
As this will never fail, can we avoid having a useless string?
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists