lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171218220715.GG15162@piout.net>
Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 23:07:15 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Add support for cros-ec-rtc
 driver.

On 13/12/2017 at 07:55:35 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> 
> > On 12/12/2017 at 17:05:37 +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > On 12/12/2017 at 16:41:39 +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > > > +   Alessandro Zummo
> > > > +   Alexandre Belloni
> > > > 
> > > > 2017-11-10 22:55 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra
> > > > <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>:
> > > > > Dear all,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is an attempt to revive some patches from that [1] patchset, some
> > > > > of them are still under discussion but I think there is no reason to not
> > > > > have the other two in this fourth version to land upstream meanwhile we
> > > > > discuss about the others.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/12/182
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v3:
> > > > > * Rebased an retested with current mainline using a Samsung Chromebook Plus
> > > > > * Removed from patchset
> > > > >   * 1/4 mfd: cros_ec: Get rid of cros_ec_check_features from cros_ec_dev.
> > > > >   * 4/4 mfd: cros_ec: add RTC as mfd subdevice.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v2:
> > > > > - Rebase on top of mainline.
> > > > > - Removed patch 'mfd: cros-ec: Fix host command buffer size' from series
> > > > > as was already picked.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes since v1:
> > > > > - Removed patch 'iio: cros_ec_sensors: Fix return value to get raw and
> > > > > calibbias data' from series as was already picked.
> > > > > - Removed patch 'iio: cros_ec_sensors: Fix return value to get raw and
> > > > > calibbias data' from series as was already picked.
> > > > > - Patch 2/5: Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <***@...nel.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >  Enric
> > > > >
> > > > > Stephen Barber (2):
> > > > >   mfd: cros_ec: Introduce RTC commands and events definitions.
> > > > >   rtc: cros-ec: add cros-ec-rtc driver.
> > > > >
> > > > >  drivers/rtc/Kconfig                  |  10 +
> > > > >  drivers/rtc/Makefile                 |   1 +
> > > > >  drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c            | 413 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h |   8 +
> > > > >  4 files changed, 432 insertions(+)
> > > > >  create mode 100644 drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry, I just noticed that my script to add the email recipients
> > > > failed and I did not add the RTC maintainers :( So this is a gentle
> > > > ping cc'ing the maintainers to take in consideration these patches. If
> > > > you want I resend or something else just let me know please.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I don't remember the specifics but I think the patches have the
> > > necessary acks from me to go through the mfd tree (didn't we agree on
> > > that ?)
> > > 
> > 
> > This was the reply from Lee a while ago:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > I don't think that one has your ack, is it ok for me to take it?
> > > 
> > > This set looks MFD heavy, so it's probably best that the set goes
> > > through MFD.  Once the RTC patch has been fixed of course.
> > 
> > The series doesn't look MFD heavy anymore so it can also go through my
> > tree. I'll let Lee decide.
> 
> Fine by me.
> 

Applied and pushed now.

Lee, if you need a immutable branch at some point, I can create one.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ