linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging: rtl8712: fix several checkpatch style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b96f4056-a379-7f34-aa46-128d208f9d63@martinhomuth.de>
Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 23:17:44 +0100
From:   Martin Homuth <martin@...tinhomuth.de>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging: rtl8712: fix several checkpatch style issues

On 12/18/2017 10:21 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 21:36 +0100, Martin Homuth wrote:
>> This patch series fixes some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl.
>>
>> It is based on next-20171218
>>
>> Martin Homuth (5):
>>   staging: rtl8712: style fix over 80 characters warnings
>>   staging: rtl8712: style fix multiple line dereferences
>>   staging: rtl8712: style fix indentation
>>   staging: rtl8712: style fix unneeded else
>>   staging: rtl8712: style fix returned error code
>>
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/ieee80211.c           |  6 ++-
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/os_intfs.c            |  5 +-
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_cmd.c         | 18 ++++---
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_recv.c        |  8 +--
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl8712_xmit.c        |  3 +-
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_cmd.c         | 36 +++++++-------
>>  drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_ioctl_linux.c | 72
>> ++++++++++++++-------------
> 
> This line wrapping is generally an indication that your email
> client (thunderbird 52.5.0) is wrapping all patches.
> 
> If you can, use git send-email instead
> 
> 

Thank you very much, I wasn't aware of this problem and finally set up
send-email appropriately. Should I resend the series right away or wait
for additional comments?