linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] trace-cmd: introduce --initital-delay for record command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9d275f1a-346a-7ca8-c6c8-d32758770fd7@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 23:45:39 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] trace-cmd: introduce --initital-delay for record
 command

On 18.12.2017 22:43, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:56:33 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>  
>> I'll have a try tomorrow if I I''lose events with 20MB buffers per CPU
>> when recording more than 60 seconds (on a very active system with
>> mentioned scheduler rtaces being turned on).
>>
> 
> Another option is to add a '-w' option to record that causes the
> recorders (what reads the data) to "wait" or force it to sleep even if
> it did read something. I'm fine with that.

Also thought about that. Might make sense (and makes -s actually do what
it advertises even when there are a lot of events coming in).

Thanks Steve

> 
> -- Steve
> 


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb