[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d47054f9-16ee-5ef2-4024-935683ce8dfa@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:30:23 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
kernellwp@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM/Eventfd: Avoid crash when assign and deassign same
eventfd in parallel.
On 18.12.2017 00:40, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> Syzroot reports crash in kvm_irqfd_assign() is caused by use-after-free.
> Because kvm_irqfd_assign() and kvm_irqfd_deassign() can't run in parallel
> for same eventfd. When assign path hasn't been finished after irqfd
> has been added to kvm->irqfds.items list, another thead may deassign the
> eventfd and free struct kvm_kernel_irqfd(). This causes assign path still
> uses struct kvm_kernel_irqfd freed by deassign path. To avoid such issue,
> add "initialized" flag in the struct kvm_kernel_irqfd and check the flag before
> deactivating irqfd. If irqfd is still in initialization, deassign path
> return fault.>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h | 1 +
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> index 76c2fbc..be6b254 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_irqfd.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct kvm_kernel_irqfd {
> struct work_struct shutdown;
> struct irq_bypass_consumer consumer;
> struct irq_bypass_producer *producer;
> + u8 initialized:1;
> };
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_KVM_IRQFD_H */
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> index a334399..80f06e6 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
> @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ int __attribute__((weak)) kvm_arch_update_irqfd_routing(
> }
> #endif
>
> + irqfd->initialized = 1;
The ugly thing in kvm_irqfd_assign() is that we access irqfd without
holding a lock. I think that should rather be fixed than working around
that issue. (e.g. lock() -> lookup again -> verify still in list ->
unlock())
> return 0;
>
> fail:
> @@ -525,6 +526,7 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
> {
Which tool are you using to generate diffs? git format-patch?
Mentioning, because the indicated function here .... (kvm_irqfd_deassign)
> struct kvm_kernel_irqfd *irqfd, *tmp;
> struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> eventfd = eventfd_ctx_fdget(args->fd);
> if (IS_ERR(eventfd))
> @@ -543,7 +545,12 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
> write_seqcount_begin(&irqfd->irq_entry_sc);
> irqfd->irq_entry.type = 0;
> write_seqcount_end(&irqfd->irq_entry_sc);
> - irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
> +
> + if (irqfd->initialized)
> + irqfd_deactivate(irqfd);
> + else
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> +
> }
> }
>
> @@ -557,7 +564,7 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
> */
and here are wrong and misleading (kvm_irqfd_deassig). (and just noticed
also in the second hunk)
> flush_workqueue(irqfd_cleanup_wq);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists